What’s on this page
Entries 121 through 123 run from September 29 to October 2, 2026. ARB Gaming LLC filed its notice of the arbitration award (ECF 121). Affirm, Inc. requested leave to file a responsive brief to the plaintiff's opposition to the ECF 111 minute order, attaching the proposed brief and a proposed order (ECF 122). The plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the ECF 116 minute order (ECF 123). The docket text for ECF 122 and 123 is taken from the Court's Notices of Electronic Filing; CourtListener had not yet received the text when this page was built.
This summary is the site operator's own description, not the Court's. The entries below are the Court's text, reproduced verbatim.
ECF 121: ARB Gaming LLCSeptember 29, 2026
NOTICE OF FINAL ARBITRATION AWARD IN DEFENDANT ARB'S FAVOR by ARB Gaming LLC. (Wall, Daniel) (Entered: 09/29/2026)
ECF 121 · NOTICE OF FINAL ARBITRATION AWARD IN DEFENDANT ARB'S FAVOR · on CourtListenerECF 122: Affirm, Inc. · docket text from the Court's Notice of Electronic Filing; CourtListener text pendingOctober 1, 2026
REQUEST for Leave to File Responsive Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Opposition to the Court's Sua Sponte Notice of Intent to Dismiss by Affirm, Inc. re [111] Minute Order,,,,,,, Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings,,,,,,. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A- Affirm Response to Opposition to Court Sua Sponte Motion to Dismiss, # (2) Proposed Order)(Lui-Kwan, Kalama)
ECF 122 · REQUEST for Leave to File Responsive Brief in Opposition… · on CourtListenerECF 123: Joyce, Matthew, in propria persona · docket text from the Court's Notice of Electronic Filing; CourtListener text pendingOctober 2, 2026
REQUEST for RECONSIDERATION re [116] Minute Order by Matthew Thomas Joyce, E-SERVICE. (Deputy Clerk OML)
ECF 123 · REQUEST for RECONSIDERATION re [116] Minute Order · on CourtListener
Docket entries are reproduced exactly as the Court entered them, including any clerical and typographical errors in the original. No entry is summarized, excerpted, or selected. Each docket page opens with a short summary in the operator’s own words, marked as such; the entries are the Court’s text. Everything here is open, including how it was built. There are no accounts, no cookies, no analytics, and nothing about you is collected or sold. Every entry can be verified against the Court’s own docket on PACER and CourtListener. Every public numbered docket entry through ECF 123 appears across this site · docket verified October 3, 2026.
I am the plaintiff in this case, and the one who made this website. Every document linked here is a public record of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Strictly noncommercial — no ads, no donations, nothing for sale.I’m not an attorney. I don’t have a law degree and I’ve never studied law. I’m a plaintiff in complex litigation without counsel, navigating it the best I can and never fully sure I’m making the right call. Proceeding pro se, and making my filings public, is the best option I have right now. This site is not legal advice and shouldn’t be relied on by anyone with a case of their own. I can’t help with or answer questions about another person’s matter — only an attorney can do that. Everyone will tell you to get a lawyer. They’re correct.
About this site & how it is built · Site last updated October 3, 2026